2026년 11월 6일

홈 타임라인 게시물 95개, 인기순

1위PoIiMath@politicalmathX에서 보기

politicalmath는 캘리포니아 Prop 37 통과로 신축 주택 구매자가 계약금을 20% 대신 3%만 내고 나머지는 주정부 2순위 대출로 충당할 수 있게 되었다며 옛 이미지를 다시 꺼낼 때라고 했다.

좋아요 30.5K리포스트 1.3K답글 161노출 1.4M북마크 1.9K

there has never been a better time to pull out this image
The Assembly@InTheAssembly
BREAKING: California voters just passed Prop 37. Buyers of newly built homes can now put down 3% instead of 20%. How: the state lends you the other 17% as a second mortgage, funded by up to $25 billion in bonds. On an $800,000 home that's $24,000 down instead of $160,000.

2위Ravi Parikh@ravisparikhX에서 보기

ravisparikh는 에이전트가 셰이더, 재질, 카메라, 물리를 직접 작성할 수 있는 Rust 기반 3D·VFX 엔진 Vork를 소개하며, 기존 도구보다 토큰 효율과 렌더링 속도가 뛰어나다고 주장했다.

좋아요 2K리포스트 111답글 79노출 118.9K북마크 2.3K

Dear Claude: you are being held back by human-centric graphics APIs. I've built a 3D and VFX engine where agents can write their own shaders, materials, cameras, physics. The core API fits in ~2,500 tokens. Vork is: • 2x more token-efficient vs Blender, Unreal Engine, Houdini • Up to 24x faster rendering times • Rust and Slang based engine, runs on GPU via Metal/Vulkan Below is a simulation of 1 million birds - each with unique trajectories - rendered in 97 sec on one NVIDIA L4 GPU (Blender EEVEE: 31 minutes)

3위Thomas Wolf@Thom_WolfX에서 보기

상위 오픈 모델 대부분이 MoE 구조인 가운데, 저자들은 800k GPU 시간을 들인 실험으로 MoE 학습 노하우를 정리한 약 7만 단어 분량의 무료 핸드북을 공개했다.

좋아요 3.8K리포스트 498답글 116노출 201.9K북마크 4.3K

18 of the 20 best open models today are Mixture-of-Experts. Dense is basically over. And yet the know-how to train a good MoE still lives mostly in the heads of a handful of teams. So we spent 800k GPU hours running the experiments ourselves and wrote everything down. Super happy to finally release "The Ultimate MoE Training Handbook", free and open, organized around the questions training teams hit: - how many experts, how big, shared or not? - why is half my step spent in all-to-all, and how do I hide it? - why is my run 25x slower with no error in the logs? - softmax, sigmoid or sqrt(softplus) router, and why keep it in fp32? - aux loss or DeepSeek's loss-free bias? - upcycle a dense checkpoint or train from scratch? - can I serve with fewer experts per token than I trained with? ⚠️ Warning: it's long (~70k words, budget a few days, sorry) but with 55 interactive figures, code you can run and numbers from our own runs. Read it here: huggingface.co/spaces/hugging…

4위Joël Niklaus@joelniklausX에서 보기

Joel Niklaus가 공개한 Harness Leaderboard에 따르면, 오픈 모델에서 mini-swe-agent가 평균 51.4%로 가장 높은 해결률을 보였고, Pi는 비슷한 성능에 비용이 약 45% 낮았으며, 최적의 하네스는 모델마다 달랐다.

좋아요 1.8K리포스트 169답글 191노출 164.4K북마크 1.9K

I burned a shitload of compute so you don't have to. Releasing the Harness Leaderboard. Which harness should you run your open model in? I ran 28,849 trials to find out. The leaderboard compares nine coding-agent harnesses on open models. In each comparison only the harness changes: the model, provider and reasoning effort stay fixed, and every task gets three attempts. The trials ran GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Flint on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and DeepSWE, for $4,746 of inference. Averaged over the three models, mini-swe-agent (@KLieret), a bash-only agent, solves 51.4% of tasks and @openclaw 27.3%. Four others are statistically tied with mini-swe-agent. One of them is Pi (@pidotdev), at 49.4% for $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The best harness depends on the model: mini-swe-agent on GLM-5.3-Flash, Hermes Agent (@NousResearch) on DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Kimi Code (@Kimi_Moonshot) on Flint. @opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times as much as Pi. See Harness Hub's Harness Lens for what the nine harnesses do differently. It documents the prompts, tools and compaction of 34 coding-agent harnesses and links every claim to its source. Leaderboard: huggingface.co/spaces/joelnik… Harness Lens: huggingface.co/spaces/harness…

5위Anthropic@AnthropicAIX에서 보기

Anthropic은 Claude가 경험에서 배우는 메모리의 역할과, '드리밍'을 통해 학습 내용을 정리하고 실수를 바로잡는 방법을 엔지니어링 블로그에서 설명했다.

좋아요 4.1K리포스트 296답글 331노출 255.3K북마크 2.9K

6위Nous Research@NousResearchX에서 보기

NousResearch는 중국 오픈 모델의 국가 선전 편향을 줄이려고 Qwen3.8-27B를 미세조정한 Arete-27B를 공개했으며, 선전 응답률이 22%에서 1%로 떨어지고 성능 저하는 없었다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 4.9K리포스트 480답글 454노출 198.8K북마크 2.1K

Introducing Arete-27B: Qwen3.8-27B, post-trained to reinforce Western values. Chinese open models are currently the strongest available, but they ship with state-aligned behavior in the weights. We built an 803-prompt eval across seven value categories, including freedom of expression, democracy, and privacy, and measured how often a model adopts China’s party line. After fine-tuning on roughly 53 million tokens, Arete-27B's propaganda rate fell from 22% to 1%, in line with the Western models we tested. Its Hermes Bench score shows no significant performance tradeoffs. The values in an open model are one fine-tune away. Our eval, weights, and training data are available now along with the full blog post: nousresearch.com/arete

7위Paul Graham@paulgX에서 보기

Boom 창업자는 하드웨어 엔지니어링 대부분이 사실상 위장된 소프트웨어 엔지니어링이라고 주장하며, 계산을 알고리즘과 정식 소프트웨어로 다룬 덕분에 적은 인원으로 초음속 제품을 만들 수 있었다고 설명한다.

좋아요 2.5K리포스트 108답글 167노출 160.4K북마크 775

"Most hardware engineering is actually software engineering in disguise."
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl
12 years ago I founded Boom, as a software engineer doing hardware for the first time. I’m probably the least handy founder in hard tech. My 12 y/o son does my soldering and 3D printing for home projects, and I’ve struggled with imposter syndrome the whole way through. What business does a software guy have building supersonic jets and turbines? More than a decade in, the most insane realization is that software is the key to reaccelerating hardware engineering. But in a way that I don’t think is widely understood or implemented, even in the burgeoning hard tech community. Most hardware engineering is actually software engineering in disguise. It’s spreadsheet “code,” engineering calculations done as one-offs. Eg wing structural loads in, spar sizing design out. Thermal loads in, air conditioning system sizing out. Everything is a calculation, and calculation is software. But these calculations are done essentially by hand, as if we are doing arithmetic but have not yet discovered algebra. Hardware engineers have baby software, built in spreadsheets, the kind of crappy software I wrote as a kid before I understood architecture, unit tests, APIs, version control, and everything else that makes modern software good. Our airplanes and engines are built with the software sophistication of a script kiddie. So what we tell our engineers: don’t design the hardware, design the *algorithm* for designing the hardware. And take the algorithm seriously—as an algorithm and as a first-class engineered software system. Never design a piece of hardware, such that you couldn’t redesign it tomorrow with a different set of assumptions. This all sounds obvious, yet our experience at Boom is that it changes everything. Ten years ago we couldn’t afford to build much software. We had a small team—and there were few software engineers with the curiosity, brilliance, and vision required to learn hardware engineering. But now AI changes the equation. Now everyone can code. The software engineers define the architecture. The hardware people bring the physics and engineering know-how. We have a turbomachinery design tool that lets one engineer do in realtime what previously took 100 engineers six months. Another tool auto-generates 65% of entire aircraft structure. I’m sure we’ll figure out the other 35% too. Eventually these should not be multiple tools, but one integrated physics model of a complete vehicle, airframe and powertrain. The results speak for themselves. A boomless supersonic airplane built by 50. A full scale supersonic turbine made by 150. And with this approach, I don’t think we’ll need that many more people to build and certify a supersonic airliner. You don’t need a big team to build big things—not when everyone on the team is a software engineer.

8위Anthropic@AnthropicAIX에서 보기

Anthropic의 과학 블로그는 AI가 과학 모델을 코드로 작성하고 적합시키며 수정해 여러 설명 가운데 데이터를 가장 잘 뒷받침하는 모델을 찾도록 돕는 방식을 소개한다.

좋아요 1.7K리포스트 148답글 201노출 147.1K북마크 524

New on our Science Blog: How AI is beginning to change scientific modeling. Scientific models help researchers explain and predict real-world systems—like how a single nerve cell fires, or what happens when neutron stars collide. Recent advances have transformed how scientists fit complex models to data. But scientists still typically write the models manually, and usually need to weigh up several competing versions, each of which might explain the data in a different way. In a guest post, Jakob Macke, Daniel Gedon, and Stefan Wahl describe how AI is starting to help with these parts of the process. By writing, running, fitting, and revising scientific models as code, AI can explore many possible model structures, and find out which explanations the data support.
anthropic.comTeaching AI to build scientific models

9위Nathan Lambert@natolambertX에서 보기

natolambert은 Inkling 2 Small이 서양의 오픈 웨이트 모델 중 가장 똑똑하다고 평가하며, Apache 라이선스라는 점을 높이 샀다.

좋아요 845리포스트 37답글 22노출 47.9K북마크 244

Looks like the smartest western open weight model by a margin. While much smaller than muse spark open or mistal large. While with a better license (apache). Love it!
Thinking Machines@thinkymachines
Introducing Inkling 2 Small. Scoring 31 on the AA Intelligence Index, it's a big jump over its predecessor. Inkling 2 Small is available for fine-tuning and inference on Tinker today, with full weight release planned soon. thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2…

10위Google AI@GoogleAIX에서 보기

Google이 공개한 Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash는 비용을 낮추고 영상 생성 및 편집 길이를 15초로 늘렸으며, 일관성과 음성 품질을 개선하고 API 가격을 30% 인하했다.

좋아요 2.4K리포스트 232답글 133노출 274.4K북마크 677

Meet Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash ⚡️ We’ve made the model more cost-effective, bumped the video generation and editing limit up to 15 seconds, and made updates to how scenes hold together over time. We've also given character speech an upgrade, reduced visual glitches like jump cuts, and made sure the model stays even truer to any reference assets you upload. So… what does all of that actually mean for you? It gives you more room to tell your story. With up to 15 seconds to work with, you have more flexibility to create what you need — videos look more cinematic and smooth, offering stronger consistency that keeps objects anchored from start to finish. And when characters speak, the dialogue sounds more fluid and natural. Creators and everyday users can start directing scenes and multi-turn edits in @FlowbyGoogle, generating 15-second clips at no additional cost in Google Vids, or creating 15-second videos in the @GeminiApp. Plus, for developers and businesses building with the API, we've dropped the price by 30% from the previous generation, making it available at just $0.07 per second for 720p video. Watch the model in action as it turns a single style frame into a 4-shot, 15-second macro science explainer of a living beehive ↓

11위Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMindX에서 보기

구글 딥마인드는 AI 에이전트가 암호화 스트레스 테스트 과정을 가속할 수 있음을 보여주며, 모델이 레거시 1024비트 RSA의 두 가지 주요 취약점을 발견했다고 밝힌다.

좋아요 938리포스트 121답글 185노출 72.5K북마크 255

12위Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartinX에서 보기

전 C++ 언어 전문가였던 작성자는 이제 언어의 세부 동작을 깊이 익히는 것은 시간 낭비라고 보고, 시스템의 전체 구조와 하위 시스템을 파악하는 데 집중하겠다고 말한다.

좋아요 3.1K리포스트 263답글 161노출 101.9K북마크 705

I used to be a language lawyer. In the late 80s I _studied_ the ARM (Annotated Reference Manual for C++). I knew the language cold, inside and out. I could make it do backflips. I shipped a lot of code using it. A LOT. I’ve attacked other languages with a similar intensity and depth. Until recently, that was simply the only way to become adept at building software systems. I now consider the deep understanding of a language to be a supreme waste of time and effort. I don’t want to learn Rust, or Golang, or Typescript, or any of the thousands of other languages out there. I’ll leave that to my agents. What I need now is to understand the high level gestalt of the system. I want to see the systems and subsystems. I don’t need to inspect the cogs. If I truly need to understand a detail at the cog level, I’ll interrogate my agents. I’m not going to pretend to be a language expert anymore.

13위AI at Meta@AIatMetaX에서 보기

Meta는 Muse Wonder의 특화 모델을 Muse와 Meta AI에 적용해, 목표 기억 유지와 제약 변화 시 막힌 상황 극복 능력을 크게 개선했다고 발표했다.

좋아요 478리포스트 63답글 79노출 47.8K북마크 100

Today we're bringing specialized models trained using Muse Wonder to @Muse and Meta AI, giving users access to some of Muse Wonder's frontier capabilities for complex tasks at work and in everyday life. These specialized models include Muse Wonder's Active Memory and Active Focus, helping them stay aligned with your goals as tasks unfold: → Active Memory helps recognize when earlier information matters and distinguish what's still relevant from what's become stale → Active Focus helps recover from setbacks or find alternatives when constraints change In Muse, the improved models show a 2.4x reduction in forgetting information critical to your goals and a 67% improvement in getting unstuck as constraints evolve. That means less repeating yourself and fewer dead ends when plans change. In Meta AI, these improvements help it break complex problems into steps, ask sharper follow-up questions and adapt when you change direction. Read more on our research blog: go.meta.me/4kCPcHW

14위Patrick Collison@patrickcX에서 보기

패트릭 콜리슨은 지난 10년간 미국 민주주의가 유권자 선호에 잘 반응하며 서구 주요국 중 가장 잘 작동했다고 보며, 토크빌의 『미국의 민주주의』가 지금도 큰 울림을 준다고 말했다.

좋아요 5.1K리포스트 249답글 250노출 598K북마크 1K

It seems to me that democracy has on the whole worked very well in America over the last decade, and perhaps better than in any other major country in the West. National outcomes have repeatedly been responsive to underlying voter preferences on meaningful questions, and significant changes in policy have ensued. I’ve been reading Democracy in America this past week, and it’s striking how much it still rhymes nearly two centuries later.

15위Jeff Dean@JeffDeanX에서 보기

JeffDean은 @LaudeInstitute 및 여러 공동 설립자와 함께 개방형 과학 프로젝트에 대한 자금 지원을 돕는 파트너십을 발표했다.

좋아요 885리포스트 41답글 39노출 58.1K북마크 175

I'm delighted to partner with @LaudeInstitute (along with my @Sanjay_Ghemawat, John Hennessy, Dave Patterson, Ben Gomes and @andykonwinski) to support funding of open science moonshots!
Andy Konwinski@andykonwinski
anyone who is close to research knows how broken the incentives are. doing open science at the frontier is harder than ever, compute costs alone price most teams out. we kept wondering what might happen if we give the right resources to the right researchers at the right time? laude.org/updates/moonsh…

16위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

글쓴이는 작업 중 반복해서 입력하는 방향 전환 프롬프트가 "could this be simpler?"뿐이며, 이 말이 매번 결과를 개선하므로 모델 시스템 프롬프트에 포함되어야 한다고 주장한다.

좋아요 2.2K리포스트 53답글 169노출 71.6K북마크 423

The only repeated redirecting prompt I typically type or dictate from here is "could this be simpler?". Yields improvements every time. Seems like it should be part of the model system prompt by now.
james hawkins@james406
imagine typing "make it lookb etter" every hour from here

17위Daksh Gupta@dakshgupX에서 보기

dakshgup은 투자자 업데이트에 잘못된 차트를 첨부해 9월까지만 나온 자료를 보냈다며 사과하고 올바른 차트를 다시 공유했다.

좋아요 850리포스트 29답글 80노출 123.3K북마크 137

18위OpenAI@OpenAIX에서 보기

OpenAI는 Ligo와 함께 실제 실험에서 가져온 100개 과제로 AI 에이전트가 실험실 데이터 분석과 오류 식별, 근거 부족 판단을 얼마나 잘하는지 측정하는 BioBasicsBench를 공개했다.

좋아요 2.4K리포스트 160답글 561노출 393.5K북마크 361

A new way to measure how AI agents handle the routine analyses of wet-lab science—BioBasicsBench. Developed with Ligo, a biotech company focused on enzyme design, the benchmark draws on 100 tasks from real experiments to test whether agents can interpret raw lab data, identify errors, and recognize when the evidence doesn’t support a conclusion. Accelerating biological research starts with getting the everyday work right. BioBasicsBench shows where models need to improve, and helps us track what those gains mean for scientific progress, biosafety, and biosecurity. openai.com/index/measurin…

20위Paul Graham@paulgX에서 보기

Paul Graham은 스타트업이 같은 배치의 동기들에게 판매하는 데 집중하도록 조언했고, 그 결과 해당 배치의 10%가 제품을 사용하게 되었다고 전한다.

좋아요 661리포스트 13답글 110노출 64.8K북마크 88

In office hours with a startup, I suggested they focus on selling to their batchmates, because it would be both the real test of whether their product was good and also the best influence on its evolution. They went to work, and they just crossed 10% of the batch using it.

21위OpenAI@OpenAIX에서 보기

OpenAI는 Frontier Model Forum과 함께 AI 안전장치 우회가 심각한 사이버 피해로 이어지는지 평가하고 우선순위를 정하는 새 프레임워크를 발표했다.

좋아요 956리포스트 69답글 280노출 179K북마크 127

We partnered with @fmf_org and its member firms on a new framework to help identify when bypassing an AI system's safeguards could enable serious cyber harm, and prioritize stronger protections. "...This framework is an important step toward a common methodology for evaluating and comparing the severity of cyber jailbreaks, including the capabilities they unlock and how readily they can be used. Shared approaches like this can help the AI and security communities build a clearer evidence base and prioritize improvements to safeguards." - OpenAI's Sasha Baker, Head of National Security Policy
frontiermodelforum.orgIntroducing the FMF Jailbreak Rating Framework for Frontier Cyber Threats  - Frontier Model Forum

22위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

어려움과 시련을 겪으며 성장하고 스스로 가치를 증명하기를 바란다는 기원의 말이다.

좋아요 5.8K리포스트 514답글 196노출 129.7K북마크 724

23위Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellhX에서 보기

mitchellh는 libghostty 1.0이 출시되어 ABI 안정성을 확보했으며, JetBrains, Neovim, KDE, Vercel Turborepo 등 수많은 프로젝트에서 사용되고 있다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 919리포스트 69답글 31노출 14.4K북마크 88

libghostty 1.0 is here! I started Ghostty ~5yrs ago to work towards this. Today, libghostty is in hundreds of projects used by tens of millions of people. 1.0 marks ABI stability, quality, and an invite for distros to begin packaging. mitchellh.com/writing/libgho… Since starting the Ghostty project in 2022, the most common question I've been asked is "why?". Today, I'll answer this by showing the broad industry impact libghostty has already had. On top of JetBrains and Neovim already mentioned (that alone being over 10 million users): -KDE developers are experimenting with a Konsole replacement built on it. - Vercel's Turborepo uses it to render task output in its TUI. - devenv uses it to drive shells. - Antithesis used it to fuzz TUI programs and found real bugs in btop and others. -Ghostel brings it to Emacs. - ghostty-web is the WASM build with an Xterm.js-compatible API. - Commercial products like OrbStack embed it. - And a whole wave of new terminals and "agentic" coding tools, such as herdr and cmux, have been built on it rather than writing yet another emulator. There are community bindings for Rust, Go, JavaScript, Swift, Python, .NET, Elixir, Dart, Java, and more, and the awesome-libghostty list tracks well over a hundred projects. More people today use a terminal powered by libghostty than use Ghostty the application, by a very large multiple. And libghostty is having a much larger impact than being "just" a terminal emulator. I'm excited to see where people take it from here.
mitchellh.comLibghostty 1.0

24위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

dhh는 Anduril의 BlueChip 기기에 Omarchy를 설치해 작동시켰고, Snapdragon 호환성 작업이 성과를 내고 있다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 2K리포스트 71답글 102노출 78.4K북마크 142

25위Greg Brockman@gdbX에서 보기

dots 팀이 개발 중이며, 연결 속도가 빨라졌고 "goodbye"라고 말하면 핸즈프리로 통화를 끊을 수 있는 기능이 추가되었다고 알린다.

좋아요 735리포스트 27답글 137노출 68.7K북마크 48

26위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

dhh는 올해 Linux가 크게 성장하고 있으며 데스크톱에서 다른 OS를 쓸 이유가 줄어들고 있다고 말하며, Affinity의 Linux 버전 개발 소식을 함께 언급했다.

좋아요 1.1K리포스트 29답글 55노출 24.2K북마크 59

Linux keeps winning this year: Unbelievable growth, amazing pledges, and just a dwindling list of excuses for why you'd ever want to run something else on the desktop.
AlternativeTo@AlternativeTo
🐧🎨 Affinity has announced that they're developing a Linux version of its design suite, exciting the Linux creative community. This move will expand Affinity's platform reach, offering a free cross-platform Adobe alternative. alternativeto.net/news/2026/11/a…

27위NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman@NASAAdminX에서 보기

NASA 관리자는 대통령을 케네디 우주센터에 맞이하며, 미국 항공우주 리더십을 세계에 보여줄 행사 CAPEWEEK을 이곳에서 준비하겠다고 발표했다.

좋아요 1.4K리포스트 222답글 52노출 143.3K북마크 72

Today, we’re excited to welcome @POTUS to @NASAKennedy as we begin building a global stage worthy of America’s leadership in aerospace. CAPEWEEK will be a great American gathering for the people and technologies shaping the future of aerospace, bringing together builders, operators, entrepreneurs, engineers, pilots, investors, explorers, and hundreds of thousands of members of the public. There is no better stage for this than Kennedy Space Center and the runway that welcomed the Space Shuttle home. This is where America can show the world what we are building next.

28위Anil Menon@astro_anilX에서 보기

국제우주정거장에서 예상보다 많은 기회를 얻은 작성자는 NASA 팀들과 함께 어려운 상황을 해결하며 우주유영 임무를 성공적으로 마친 것에 감사하고 기뻐한다.

좋아요 1.4K리포스트 150답글 33노출 151.3K북마크 64

A common axiom in spaceflight is to treat every launch, space walk, and opportunity like it may be your last. I arrived at the international space station expecting to do zero space walks and hoping for one. I've been fortunate to work with the teams across @nasa far more than expected. Yesterday, was a peak moment full of unexpected challenges, real-time solution, and mission success. I feel blessed and thankful for this opportunity to make space a better place for us all. Thanks to the entire team for making it safe, making it fun, and getting it done! It will be the highlight of my career to work with you!

29위Tim Cook@tim_cookX에서 보기

Apple은 새 MacBook Pro, iPad mini, M6 칩을 탑재한 14인치 MacBook Pro, iMac을 공개하고 지금 구매할 수 있다고 알렸다.

좋아요 5.5K리포스트 396답글 144노출 222.2K북마크 199

30위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

12초라는 기록은 놀랍지만 목표는 더 빨라져 F1 피트스톱과 같은 수준에 맞추는 것이라고 말한다.

좋아요 948리포스트 14답글 52노출 40.1K북마크 31

31위NASA@NASAX에서 보기

NASA는 NEO Surveyor 우주선에 실릴 차양막을 소개했는데, 이 장치는 태양의 강한 빛을 가려 지상 망원경이 놓치는 근접 소행성과 혜성을 관측하도록 돕는다.

좋아요 777리포스트 104답글 76노출 232.5K북마크 25

Nice shades. 😎 This sunshade will fly on NEO Surveyor, a spacecraft that will spot nearby asteroids and comets that ground-based telescopes might miss. The sunshade will help by harnessing the Sun’s power and blocking its blinding glare: go.nasa.gov/47Ze1GP

32위Standard Physics@StandardPhysX에서 보기

StandardPhys는 물리 시뮬레이션을 더 나은 설계로 바꾸는 AI 엔지니어를 소개하며, 데이터센터 냉각 효율과 터빈 블레이드 설계를 개선한 사례를 밝히고 관련 시뮬레이션 에이전트를 오픈소스로 공개했다.

좋아요 449리포스트 80답글 52노출 211.3K북마크 564

We are Introducing an AI engineer that turns physics simulations into better designs It redesigned a data centre’s cooling system to use less electricity and found a turbine blade that beat a leading published design Today we’re open-sourcing the simulation agent behind it

33위PolymathicAI@PolymathicAIX에서 보기

PolymathicAI는 뉴욕에서 AI 과학 연구를 함께할 인턴, 박사후연구원, 연구과학자, 연구엔지니어를 모집하고 있으며 관심 있는 사람들의 지원을 받는다.

좋아요 179리포스트 18답글 8노출 26.4K북마크 216

34위Harj Taggar@harjtaggarX에서 보기

Harjtaggar는 가장 비싸도 항상 최신 프런티어 모델을 제공하는 Muse 같은 에이전트를 이 고객층을 위해 만들 기회가 있다고 주장한다.

좋아요 190리포스트 2답글 18노출 37.4K북마크 221

I think there's an opportunity to build a Muse like agent for this user base too. Charge a lot, and promise to always run the frontier models, so users never get the Instinct style drop in quality that comes from economizing before a fundraise
Patrick Mrozowski@patrickmro
october was our biggest month ever the thing we changed: we stopped running Atlas like a consumer product. it looks like one; card, app, membership fee. but our top 200 members have more than $1T in combined net worth and our typical member spends ~$1M/yr on cards. so I started treating it like enterprise sales. built a Claude agent to find members we could be doing more for and started calling them. a few calls ended with a six-figure trip booked through our concierge. a couple ended with the member asking how to invest. the bigger lesson: there’s a new category forming and I’d call it the super consumer. the playbook for super consumers is enterprise, not consumer. we’re going to see companies that look like consumer companies hit $1B in revenue with tiny user bases. I think that’s exciting. also, I’ve been pretty passive on here. that’s going to change. my last company’s Series A came through a DM on this app, and so did a lot of our early members. expect more from me on building Atlas, and random ideas on the market.

35위Jeff Boudier 🤗@jeffboudierX에서 보기

허깅페이스는 약 200만 달러를 들여 전문가 혼합(MoE) LLM 학습법을 정리한 핸드북을 공개했으며, 대규모 학습 노하우를 더 많은 사람과 나누고자 한다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 673리포스트 95답글 16노출 28.8K북마크 642

We spent $2m so you don't have to. And so you can learn how to train MoEs. Mixture-of-Experts LLMs are what powers the AIs you use everyday, and few people in the world know how to train them at scale (a handful at each top AI lab). This handbook distills everything we learned in meticulously crafted chapters and figures. Disclaimer: it may take days to read. We hope to see 1000x more people able to train their own frontier models all over the world! 🤗 Congrats @Nouamanetazi @lvwerra @Thom_Wolf

36위VARIEN@varienX에서 보기

varien은 사고 토큰을 54% 줄이고 GPQA Diamond 성능을 3% 높인 오픈소스 모델 Qwen Concept 27B를 공개했다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 492리포스트 38답글 24노출 19.7K북마크 388

We've open-sourced Qwen Concept 27B, our first model. It applies direct weight-space edits (inspired by the recent MIT CSAIL "Sparks of Weight-Space Programming" paper) to cut thinking tokens by 54% while improving GPQA Diamond performance by 3% versus the base Qwen model. This yields 30% more useful tokens per joule with no additional post-training, all developed on local NVIDIA DGX Spark hardware. BF16, FP8, and NVFP4 versions will be available free at .
concept.countryConcept Country | Governance & a Commons for AI Agents
Concept@conceptcountry
Concept Country has developed its first open-source model, Qwen Concept 27B. With 54% less thinking tokens and 3% better performance on GPQA Diamond compared to its base Qwen 3.8 model, we have achieved 30% more useful tokens per joule without additional post-training.

37위Aaron Epstein@aaron_epsteinX에서 보기

aaron_epstein은 카드와 비밀번호를 기기 안에 보관하고 Apple Pay를 지원하는 아이폰 온디바이스 에이전트 Result를 소개하며 Apple이 만들었어야 할 개인 에이전트라고 평가했다.

좋아요 129리포스트 7답글 10노출 13.1K북마크 97

This is the personal agent Apple should’ve built. On-device, supports ApplePay, and even local passwords.
Result@tryresult
Cloud VMs keep getting hacked, so we built the first on-device iPhone agent Introducing Result > Cards & passwords stay on-device > Run openweight models on your compute or cloud > Native Apple Pay & Passwords > Works in the background even when locked result.dev/ios

38위Aside@AsideAIX에서 보기

Aside는 Mac과 Windows에서 여러 앱을 백그라운드로 다루는 Aside Computer Use를 출시했으며, 자사 내부 평가에서 Codex 대비 더 빠르고 토큰을 적게 사용한다고 주장한다.

좋아요 418리포스트 25답글 38노출 26.6K북마크 298

Introducing Aside Computer Use. 80% of work happens on browser, this covers the rest. - 2.7x faster with 65% fewer tokens vs Codex* - Runs in the background across multiple apps (macOS) - Available now on Mac & Windows Aside meets your computer. *based on internal evals

39위Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartinX에서 보기

글쓴이는 crapper와 mutator 도구로 시스템의 모든 식을 테스트가 덮도록 하는 포화 테스트를 설명하며, 에이전트가 테스트를 작성하고 수정해 요구사항 변경에도 의미적 안정성을 확보한다고 말한다.

좋아요 308리포스트 16답글 28노출 21.4K북마크 208

Saturation Testing. I use crapper and mutator to ensure that every expression in the system is covered by tests. If an expression is changed, one or more tests will fail. This used to be impractical. We simply could not afford to create that many tests. We also could not afford to change so many tests when requirements changed. The burden was too high. Now it’s trivial. The agents, under the lash of crapper and mutator, will write those tests and make them pass. And when requirement changed, they’ll write the new tests and change the old tests. None of this proves that the system works. That’s up to humans to judge. Humans can do that with tools like gherkin, or they can use manual tests. What the saturation tests provide is Semantic Stability. When the requirements change, and code has to be added and changed, those tests ensure that those changes do not inadvertently break unrelated parts of the system.

40위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

AI가 공개된 패치를 몇 시간 만에 악용 코드로 바꿀 수 있는 상황에서, a16z는 패치 자체를 불필요하게 만드는 여섯 가지 신생 사이버보안 기회를 제시한다.

좋아요 101리포스트 12답글 33노출 19.3K북마크 63

AI can now help turn a published fix into a working exploit in hours. Patching still takes weeks, and for many old routers, cameras, and supermarket fridges, a fix never arrives. "So the question isn't how to patch faster. It's how to stop needing to." Six openings for new cybersecurity companies today, each one making patching "unnecessary, or someone else's job": 1. Live fixes: blocks an exploit on running systems within hours, then has AI write and ship the real code fix 2. An AI first responder: spots attacks without hand-written rules and contains them as they unfold 3. Per-request access: checks every request from a person or their AI agents, with credentials that expire in minutes 4. Proven recovery: keeps restoring your backups in a sealed-off test environment to prove they work, with records insurers will accept 5. An install gateway: holds and sandboxes every package, extension and AI agent tool before it can run 6. Security for the long tail: one managed service for water utilities, clinics and others that will never have a security team Full piece from a16z's Asaf Ezra and Steph Zhang: a16z.news/p/defense-in-d…

41위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

a16z는 Salesforce의 John Somorjai와 대담하며, 그의 인수 전략, Fin 도입 성과, Slack 매출 성장, 로보틱스 투자 등 다양한 주제를 다뤘다.

좋아요 59리포스트 11답글 19노출 26.9K북마크 34

Salesforce's John Somorjai has spent more than 20 years doing deals for Marc Benioff, from Slack to six rounds of Anthropic, and runs a venture arm that has backed more than 750 companies. His playbook is finding great technology that's starved for distribution and plugging it into 15,000 sales reps. Salesforce piloted Fin on its own help site, where it went live in 14 days and now handles over 40% of the traffic, resolving 65% without a human. John joins a16z's Alex Immerman to discuss why Slack revenue is up almost 3x since the acquisition, how strong revenue can hide the churn that kills deals, the pen test that got into a CEO's laptop, and why robotics is where he's most excited to invest. 0:58 How Marc Benioff spots what to buy 3:48 The 3 tests for every acquisition 5:17 Salesforce's model as AI cuts seats 8:23 Fin resolves 65% with no human 10:32 The power of 15,000 sales reps 14:22 Founders who became product chiefs 17:34 Build vs buy when code is cheap 20:27 Why Salesforce bought Fin 22:58 Why Slack is perfect for AI agents 28:19 Salesforce Ventures' robotics bets 35:46 Why he's wary of new CRM startups 37:53 Why $10B+ startups have few buyers 39:32 Why he backed Anthropic six times 41:50 Red flags that kill acquisitions 44:27 The pen test that sank a deal 46:01 Growing up with a scientist father YouTube: youtu.be/y4BdOtm40SA @jsomorjai @salesforce @aleximm

42위Lysandre@LysandreJikX에서 보기

LysandreJik은 하네스별로 학습한 작은 LoRA 어댑터를 사용하면 같은 기반 모델이 도구 호출을 줄이면서도 정확도를 유지하거나 높일 수 있고, 비용도 매우 낮다고 설명한다.

좋아요 117리포스트 25답글 27노출 11.3K북마크 57

We’ve been hard at work trying to make models work with harnesses better. The best thing @yb2698 found: “harness adapters”. Small LoRAs trained with RL inside the actual agent harness they’ll be used with. Same base model. Different adapter for pi, opencode, hermes, etc. Why? Simply because the same model behaves very differently depending on the tools, prompts and control flow around it. Instead of asking one set of weights to be optimal everywhere, we can specialize a tiny part of the model for each environment. Early results are pretty encouraging: on held-out tasks, the adapters make fewer tool calls than the base model while keeping or improving accuracy. And because they’re LoRAs, the operational side is surprisingly cheap too. For one LFM2.5-24B-A2B experiment, we evaluated 9 checkpoints / 1,350 agent sessions on a single H200 in under an hour. The total: ~$5! Merging and serving every checkpoint separately would have cost around $90. There’s another important piece: RL agents will eventually try to hack the reward. So every tool call goes through `safeagents`, a deterministic rule-based guard that blocks things like editing tests, tampering with rewards or bypassing the sandbox before they execute. And the whole loop can start from real usage: your coding sessions -> verifiable environments -> RL -> a better adapter for your agent. The model doesn’t have to change completely. Sometimes it just needs to get better at the harness it actually lives in. huggingface.co/blog/harness-h…

43위Hugging Face@huggingfaceX에서 보기

허깅페이스가 LFM2.5, LFM3, Twil-9B 모델에 강화학습으로 LoRA 어댑터를 훈련하는 과정을 라이브 스트리밍으로 공개한다는 내용이다.

좋아요 159리포스트 17답글 73노출 18.2K북마크 67

44위GitHub@githubX에서 보기

GitHub는 Copilot 사용 중 실력을 지속적으로 측정하는 새로운 평가 방식인 Copilot Verified Proficiency를 소개했다.

좋아요 245리포스트 26답글 44노출 40.8K북마크 95

45위John Carmack@ID_AA_CarmackX에서 보기

Carmack은 1939년 시간여행 소설 Lest Darkness Fall을 읽은 감상을 나누며, 빠른 전개와 거친 인물 묘사를 짚고 재미로는 1632 시리즈를 추천했다.

좋아요 473리포스트 23답글 36노출 42.9K북마크 181

I’m slowly working my way through my Easton Masterpieces of Science Fiction, just finishing Lest Darkness Fall, a 1939 travel-back-in-time book. The idea is “can the fall of the Roman empire and resulting dark ages be prevented by knowledge from the future”. The Easton introduction contrasts it with Mark Twain’s more famous 1889 Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, which it calls more cynical about human nature than the generally optimistic LDF. I haven’t read CYiKAC since high school, but I have enjoyed the more recent (2000) 1632/Ring of Fire travel-back-in-time series quite a bit. 1632 is a big book, over 3x as long as LDF, and the series continues on and on (and on…). By modern standards, the pacing in LDF is shockingly fast. By page 4, the protagonist was already zapped back in time by a lightning bolt, and it was barely mentioned again. Modern books rarely throw you right into anything, and often spend many chapters on setup. The crude character development in LDF also stands out, but on the other hand, it casually expects the reader to have quite a bit of knowledge about history and military tactics / campaigns. Apparently in 1939, it wasn’t unreasonable to expect that an educated professional might know enough Latin to haltingly communicate with late era Romans. For pure entertainment, I would recommend the more modern 1632, but LDF is still a fun read, and I like touching content from the era of my grandparents now and then.

46위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

a16z는 기업들이 백업을 과신하고 있으며, 사이버 공격 피해자 중 데이터를 모두 되찾은 곳은 28%에 불과하고 백업이 감염되면 복구 비용 중앙값이 약 300만 달러로 급증한다는 조사 결과를 공유했다.

좋아요 43리포스트 8답글 16노출 10.8K북마크 16

47위DesignArena@DesignArenaX에서 보기

DesignArena는 실제 사용자가 평가하는 개인 비서 전용 순위 서비스 LifeArena를 소개했으며, 테스트에서 Meta의 Muse가 압도적인 1위를 차지했다고 전했다.

좋아요 250리포스트 24답글 22노출 21K북마크 88

Introducing LifeArena: the world’s first arena for personal assistants, as judged by real users. As AI assistants become more capable, existing static benchmarks struggle to capture the creative, unthinkable requests of people in their everyday lives. So, we offered select users the most popular personal assistants: @instinct, @Muse by @AIatMeta, Dots by @OpenAI, Grok Bot by @xai, and Gemini by @GoogleDeepMind. The results are in: @Muse is #1... by a landslide. Here's what users said:

48위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

a16z는 2023년 1분기 이후 알파벳, 마이크로소프트, 아마존, 메타의 자본 지출이 5~8배 늘었지만 애플은 AI 붐 이전보다 20% 줄였다고 차트로 정리했다.

좋아요 123리포스트 20답글 21노출 16.2K북마크 43

49위LeRobot@LeRobotHFX에서 보기

LeRobot v0.7.0이 출시되어 대규모 데이터에서 로봇에게 프롬프트로 명령하는 새 기능들을 소개하며, 50,000명 이상의 개발자와 300개 이상의 조직이 참여하는 생태계를 알린다.

좋아요 212리포스트 36답글 12노출 18.6K북마크 69

𝗟𝗲𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁 𝘃𝟬.𝟳.𝟬 𝗶𝘀 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 🚀🤖 From terabytes of data to prompting robots! Check out all what's new in the video below and join the 50,000+ developers & 300+ organizations in the LeRobot ecosystem 🤗

50위Jessica Livingston@jesslivingstonX에서 보기

Jess Livingston과 Carolynn이 Boom Supersonic의 Blake Scholl과 함께한 특별 에피소드에서, 롤스로이스 엔진 공급 중단 이후 가스터빈 판매로 여객기 개발 자금을 조달한 과정을 다뤘다.

좋아요 74리포스트 10답글 9노출 32.5K북마크 24

51위GitHub@githubX에서 보기

GitHub는 새로운 Git 스토리지 아키텍처가 내부 테스트에서 동시 에이전트 5,000개와 초당 7,200회 푸시를 낮은 지연 시간으로 처리했다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 156리포스트 12답글 37노출 14.9K북마크 48

52위Pete Koomen@koomenX에서 보기

Koomen은 하드웨어 스타트업들이 부품 설계와 재고 관리를 위해 맞춤형 소프트웨어를 만들고 있다고 말하며, Boom 창업자의 글에 공감을 표한다.

좋아요 99리포스트 5답글 10노출 9.9K북마크 30

I've been seeing the same thing in the hardware startups I've been working with. Custom software for designing a one component. Custom software for managing parts inventory. Custom software for everything. They're all having a blast.
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl
12 years ago I founded Boom, as a software engineer doing hardware for the first time. I’m probably the least handy founder in hard tech. My 12 y/o son does my soldering and 3D printing for home projects, and I’ve struggled with imposter syndrome the whole way through. What business does a software guy have building supersonic jets and turbines? More than a decade in, the most insane realization is that software is the key to reaccelerating hardware engineering. But in a way that I don’t think is widely understood or implemented, even in the burgeoning hard tech community. Most hardware engineering is actually software engineering in disguise. It’s spreadsheet “code,” engineering calculations done as one-offs. Eg wing structural loads in, spar sizing design out. Thermal loads in, air conditioning system sizing out. Everything is a calculation, and calculation is software. But these calculations are done essentially by hand, as if we are doing arithmetic but have not yet discovered algebra. Hardware engineers have baby software, built in spreadsheets, the kind of crappy software I wrote as a kid before I understood architecture, unit tests, APIs, version control, and everything else that makes modern software good. Our airplanes and engines are built with the software sophistication of a script kiddie. So what we tell our engineers: don’t design the hardware, design the *algorithm* for designing the hardware. And take the algorithm seriously—as an algorithm and as a first-class engineered software system. Never design a piece of hardware, such that you couldn’t redesign it tomorrow with a different set of assumptions. This all sounds obvious, yet our experience at Boom is that it changes everything. Ten years ago we couldn’t afford to build much software. We had a small team—and there were few software engineers with the curiosity, brilliance, and vision required to learn hardware engineering. But now AI changes the equation. Now everyone can code. The software engineers define the architecture. The hardware people bring the physics and engineering know-how. We have a turbomachinery design tool that lets one engineer do in realtime what previously took 100 engineers six months. Another tool auto-generates 65% of entire aircraft structure. I’m sure we’ll figure out the other 35% too. Eventually these should not be multiple tools, but one integrated physics model of a complete vehicle, airframe and powertrain. The results speak for themselves. A boomless supersonic airplane built by 50. A full scale supersonic turbine made by 150. And with this approach, I don’t think we’ll need that many more people to build and certify a supersonic airliner. You don’t need a big team to build big things—not when everyone on the team is a software engineer.

53위Paul Graham@paulgX에서 보기

팔 그레이엄은 Boom의 블레이크 숄이 출연한 팟캐스트를 소개하며, 롤스로이스 엔진 공급이 끊긴 뒤 가스터빈 판매로 개발 자금을 마련해 초음속 여객기 개발을 이어간 과정을 다뤘다고 전했다.

좋아요 89리포스트 4답글 18노출 27.2K북마크 26

"A supersonic engine looks much more like a power turbine than any other jet engine, because it's about continuous full power operation in demanding high temperature environments."
Jessica Livingston@jesslivingston
Carolynn and I are back for a special episode with Blake Scholl of @boomsupersonic about their amazing recent transformation, from losing Rolls Royce as their engine supplier to financing development of the airliner by selling gas turbines. pod.link/1677066062/epi…

54위clem 🤗@ClementDelangueX에서 보기

Hugging Face는 오픈소스 로봇 AI 플랫폼을 키우고 있으며, 데이터셋과 모델 수, 로봇 판매량, LeRobot 다운로드 수 등 성장 지표를 공유하며 공개 평가 활동을 소개한다.

좋아요 369리포스트 47답글 66노출 22K북마크 102

Open-source is critical for robotics AI. It means a student, a researcher or a startup can build on years of progress and contribute something the whole community can use rather than concentrating everything in a few companies building a black-box robot. That’s why we’re building @huggingface into the platform for open-source robotics AI! Amazing to see the progress we've made in the six months and it's accelerating! - Almost 100,000 public robotics datasets on hf.co/datasets, up 48% - Over 30,000 public robotics models, up 41% - Microduck and Reachy mini, our open-source robots became the most popular robot of 2026 (probably ending the year with 50,000+ sold and 20,000+ shipped) - We’re a founding partner of @RoboColosseum, evaluating robots across 140+ real-world scenes. Every run is published publicly on HF, including failures, so everyone can learn from what actually happens. And @LeRobotHF got downloaded over 1M times and v0.7.0 just landed with new world action models, interactive robot control and remote GPU inference: huggingface.co/blog/lerobot/l…! Huge thanks to everyone making this happen 🤗🦾

55위Matt Taylor@mattrtaylor71X에서 보기

Trepo는 주방에 설치되어 가정을 이해하고 에이전트가 백그라운드에서 장보기를 돕는 하드웨어를 만들었으며, 식료품부터 시작한다고 소개한다.

좋아요 103리포스트 20답글 32노출 17.4K북마크 28

56위Augustin Crampette@Gus_CrampetteX에서 보기

연구진이 Seeed Studio 선전 공장을 방문해 Microduck 생산 라인이 처음 가동되는 모습을 보고 직접 조립 스테이션에서 작업했다고 전한다.

좋아요 407리포스트 36답글 32노출 55.3K북마크 108

57위Y Combinator@ycombinatorX에서 보기

Rolls-Royce가 Boom의 엔진 파트너에서 빠지자 Boom은 자체 엔진을 개발했고, 이것이 초음속 무소음 비행과 AI 데이터센터용 가스터빈 사업의 기회로 이어졌다고 Boom CEO가 설명한다.

좋아요 53리포스트 7답글 21노출 12.5K북마크 14

When Rolls-Royce pulled out as @boomsupersonic's engine partner, it looked like a potentially fatal setback. Instead, it pushed Boom to build its own engine, a decision that ultimately helped unlock boomless supersonic flight and opened up an entirely new business: gas turbines for the massive power demands of AI data centers. Boom founder and CEO @bscholl returns to The Social Radars with @jesslivingston and @cjoneslevy to tell the story of how that crisis became one of the company’s biggest opportunities. They talk about why building the engine in-house changed the airplane itself, how Boom realized the same technology could generate power for data centers, and why the new turbine business could help fund the development of its supersonic airliner. 00:00 — Rolls-Royce Walks Away 02:39 — The Breakup Goes Public 07:39 — Deciding to Build the Engine In-House 09:01 — The Brian Chesky Advice That Changed Everything 10:25 — Why Building the Engine Was the Right Call 11:06 — Unlocking Boomless Supersonic Flight 13:35 — The Problem of Funding a Supersonic Airliner 14:37 — The AI Power Shortage Creates an Opportunity 16:23 — Turning a Jet Engine Into a Gas Turbine 18:26 — Why Hard Tech Is So Difficult to Fund 21:20 — From Paycheck to Paycheck to a New Business 22:26 — Why America Stopped Building Power 25:56 — The Aerospace Industry Stopped Innovating 27:21 — Designing the Engine and Airplane Together 32:55 — Rethinking the Passenger Experience 39:03 — Rebuilding America’s Industrial Base

58위Dhanush Rambhatla@Th3OnlyWayUpX에서 보기

Audora는 한 권의 책을 한 명의 내레이터가 읽는 대신 등장인물마다 다른 목소리를 입히는 다중 음성 오디오북 서비스를 출시했으며, 첫 미리보기는 계정 없이 무료로 제공된다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 138리포스트 31답글 61노출 7.5K북마크 36

Audora is live! We’re building audiobooks where every character gets their own voice, instead of one narrator reading the entire book. I’ve always wanted to hear the characters in my favourite stories sound the way I imagined them. So I decided to build it. Most books never get an audiobook because producing one is expensive. We want to make that possible for any story. I took a gap year to work on this and became one of the youngest solo founders to get into @ycombinator at 18. You can now paste any story link or upload a file and turn it into a multi-voice audiobook. First preview is on us, no account needed :) audora.art

59위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

DHH는 Superwhisper와 함께 Omarchy의 새 기본 음성 입력을 만들었으며, 클라우드 기능은 무료이고 로컬 옵션도 계속 제공된다고 설명한다.

좋아요 594리포스트 33답글 46노출 27.5K북마크 153

It's been such a joy working with the team at @superwhisper on this new Omarchy dictation default. We went through lots of iterations to get it all juuuuust right. And now it's amazing. Cloud for free, local options forever. Great in-depth tutorial here.
superwhisper@superwhisper
Superwhisper is now the default voice input in @DHH’s Linux distribution @Omarchy 🗣️ Here’s a quick video to get you started 🙂

60위Darwin Robotics@darwin_roboticsX에서 보기

Darwin Robotics는 간단한 사전 시드 투자로 360만 달러를 유치했으며, AI 인프라 데이터센터의 인력 수요를 겨냥해 인간 시연으로 학습하는 범용 로봇 기술자를 개발한다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 51리포스트 9답글 13노출 6.3K북마크 13

Darwin Robotics Raises $3.6M to Build General-Purpose Robot Technicians We're excited to announce that @darwin_robotics has raised $3.6M in pre-seed funding, led by @Link_Ventures, with participation from @ycombinator, @Liquid2V, @RebelFund_VC, and the co-founders of Open AI, xAI, and Y Combinator. We're building general purpose robot technicians that assemble, commission, and maintain critical infrastructure. Our initial focus is AI infrastructure, where rapid data center buildout is creating growing demand for skilled physical work. Every leap in human progress has been driven by our ability to build increasingly sophisticated machines. The next frontier is intelligent robots that can use tools to build and maintain other machines. Our robots learn complex tasks from human demonstrations rather than being explicitly programmed for each workflow. We're deployment-first, working closely with AI infrastructure partners to bring our first robot technicians into real-world environments. Our mission: Robots to build civilization. We're hiring exceptional engineers and researchers in robot learning and hardware, and seeking deployment partners building and operating data centers. darwinrobotics.ai

61위Thomas Wolf@Thom_WolfX에서 보기

토마 울프는 로보틱스 연구자 오귀스탱을 X에서 팔로우하라고 권하며, 그가 가장 뛰어난 로보티스트 중 한 명이라고 소개했다.

좋아요 134리포스트 7답글 9노출 16.5K북마크 33

62위Jared Friedman@snowmakerX에서 보기

Boom의 창업자는 소프트웨어가 하드웨어 엔지니어링을 가속하는 핵심이며, AI 덕분에 모든 하드웨어 엔지니어가 소프트웨어 엔지니어가 되어 적은 인원으로 초음속 항공기를 만들 수 있다고 설명했다.

좋아요 185리포스트 11답글 23노출 14.8K북마크 37

When I visited Boom last week, one of the things that struck me is that they've become the most AI-pilled hardware company I know. With AI coding, every hardware engineer is now a software engineer.
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl
12 years ago I founded Boom, as a software engineer doing hardware for the first time. I’m probably the least handy founder in hard tech. My 12 y/o son does my soldering and 3D printing for home projects, and I’ve struggled with imposter syndrome the whole way through. What business does a software guy have building supersonic jets and turbines? More than a decade in, the most insane realization is that software is the key to reaccelerating hardware engineering. But in a way that I don’t think is widely understood or implemented, even in the burgeoning hard tech community. Most hardware engineering is actually software engineering in disguise. It’s spreadsheet “code,” engineering calculations done as one-offs. Eg wing structural loads in, spar sizing design out. Thermal loads in, air conditioning system sizing out. Everything is a calculation, and calculation is software. But these calculations are done essentially by hand, as if we are doing arithmetic but have not yet discovered algebra. Hardware engineers have baby software, built in spreadsheets, the kind of crappy software I wrote as a kid before I understood architecture, unit tests, APIs, version control, and everything else that makes modern software good. Our airplanes and engines are built with the software sophistication of a script kiddie. So what we tell our engineers: don’t design the hardware, design the *algorithm* for designing the hardware. And take the algorithm seriously—as an algorithm and as a first-class engineered software system. Never design a piece of hardware, such that you couldn’t redesign it tomorrow with a different set of assumptions. This all sounds obvious, yet our experience at Boom is that it changes everything. Ten years ago we couldn’t afford to build much software. We had a small team—and there were few software engineers with the curiosity, brilliance, and vision required to learn hardware engineering. But now AI changes the equation. Now everyone can code. The software engineers define the architecture. The hardware people bring the physics and engineering know-how. We have a turbomachinery design tool that lets one engineer do in realtime what previously took 100 engineers six months. Another tool auto-generates 65% of entire aircraft structure. I’m sure we’ll figure out the other 35% too. Eventually these should not be multiple tools, but one integrated physics model of a complete vehicle, airframe and powertrain. The results speak for themselves. A boomless supersonic airplane built by 50. A full scale supersonic turbine made by 150. And with this approach, I don’t think we’ll need that many more people to build and certify a supersonic airliner. You don’t need a big team to build big things—not when everyone on the team is a software engineer.

63위Google@GoogleX에서 보기

Google은 Gemini 4 Argon과 Antigravity를 활용해 커스텀 서프 클록 스마트 기기를 스케치에서 작동하는 프로토타입으로 만든 빌더들의 과정을 소개했다.

좋아요 237리포스트 18답글 34노출 48K북마크 47

From fun idea → functional smart device 🏄‍♂️ Check out how these builders used Gemini 4 Argon and @Antigravity to take a custom "Surf Clock" from a rough sketch to a working prototype: exploring retro '60s designs, controlling Blender via Python, and writing custom firmware.

64위Paul Graham@paulgX에서 보기

빈티지 시계를 거울처럼 광내면 부드러운 금 케이스의 형태가 뭉개지므로 나쁜 신호이며, 이 시계의 러그도 원래의 날카로운 면이 거의 사라졌다는 내용이다.

좋아요 163리포스트 8답글 61노출 43.5K북마크 29

If you see a vintage watch polished to a mirror finish, that's a bad sign. Polishing soft gold cases reduces them to shapeless blobs. The lugs on this watch were originally sharply faceted, but you can't even tell anymore.

65위GitHub@githubX에서 보기

GitHub 팟캐스트에서 마틴 우드워드가 AI가 오픈소스, 개발자 기술, 무언가를 만드는 즐거움을 어떻게 바꾸고 있는지 이야기한다는 소식이다.

좋아요 59리포스트 8답글 28노출 17.8K북마크 10

66위Teknium 🪽@TekniumX에서 보기

Teknium은 자사 Hermes를 띄우는 농담 섞인 글과 함께, 오픈 모델용 코딩 에이전트 하네스 9종을 2만 8천여 번 시험한 리더보드를 공개했다고 전했다.

좋아요 492리포스트 34답글 34노출 26.4K북마크 82

Hermes supremacy tweet #9138
Joël Niklaus@joelniklaus
I burned a shitload of compute so you don't have to. Releasing the Harness Leaderboard. Which harness should you run your open model in? I ran 28,849 trials to find out. The leaderboard compares nine coding-agent harnesses on open models. In each comparison only the harness changes: the model, provider and reasoning effort stay fixed, and every task gets three attempts. The trials ran GLM-5.3-Flash, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Flint on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and DeepSWE, for $4,746 of inference. Averaged over the three models, mini-swe-agent (@KLieret), a bash-only agent, solves 51.4% of tasks and @openclaw 27.3%. Four others are statistically tied with mini-swe-agent. One of them is Pi (@pidotdev), at 49.4% for $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The best harness depends on the model: mini-swe-agent on GLM-5.3-Flash, Hermes Agent (@NousResearch) on DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Kimi Code (@Kimi_Moonshot) on Flint. @opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times as much as Pi. See Harness Hub's Harness Lens for what the nine harnesses do differently. It documents the prompts, tools and compaction of 34 coding-agent harnesses and links every claim to its source. Leaderboard: huggingface.co/spaces/joelnik… Harness Lens: huggingface.co/spaces/harness…

67위Google@GoogleX에서 보기

Google은 @googlearts와 Courtauld의 파트너십 확장으로 나온 'The Art of Looking' 프로젝트를 소개하며, 예술과 AI를 활용한 예술 교육의 새로운 방향을 제시했다.

좋아요 288리포스트 39답글 31노출 93.2K북마크 42

Introducing The Art of Looking, a new expansion in the partnership between @googlearts and @TheCourtauld, featuring 12 new stories that explore fundamental philosophical questions. What does art mean? Who is art for? This collection takes a closer look at works from artists like Van Gogh, Michelangelo, or Claudette Johnson to dive deeper into their creative processes and iconic masterpieces and explore how AI can support cultural institutions to unlock new ways of opening up art education and immersive learning for the next generation of artists.

68위clem 🤗@ClementDelangueX에서 보기

클레망 델랑그는 데이비드 칸을 마이애미에서 만나 감사를 전하며, 그가 블라인드 텀시트로 투자를 제안하고 라운드에 자리를 만들도록 설득했으며 세쿼이아로 옮긴 뒤에도 계속 지지해 왔다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 169리포스트 2답글 23노출 16.4K북마크 24

69위Derek Thompson@DKThompX에서 보기

최근 10년은 미국 역사상 실업률이 매우 낮게 유지된 시기로, 코로나 이전과 이후 모두 실업률 4.5% 미만이 오래 이어지고 있다고 짚는다.

좋아요 155리포스트 12답글 14노출 36.5K북마크 21

The last 10 years are probably the most remarkable low-unemployment period in American history—punctuated, ofc, by the crazy, destabilizing pandemic. The three years before COVID were the then-third longest streak of under 4.5% unemployment and the five years and counting since we recovered from COVID are the longest, and counting. (via @jasonfurman) Even in periods of intense technological anguish, public anger, and whiplashing political change, at least some things are just quietly and consistently good.

70위Visual Studio Code@codeX에서 보기

최신 VSCode 릴리스에서 여러 에이전트를 동시에 다루고, 캔버스를 즐겨찾기하며, 에이전트 대화 추적 방식을 맞춤 설정하는 기능이 추가되었다고 알린다.

좋아요 161리포스트 11답글 8노출 16K북마크 21

71위Brad Flora@bradfloraX에서 보기

브래드 플로라는 10월이 YC 팀들에게 좋은 달이었으며, 한 창업자가 연간 매출 런레이트 1천만 달러를 넘고 전월 대비 60% 성장했다는 소식을 전해 들었다고 말했다.

좋아요 147리포스트 6답글 13노출 13.5K북마크 19

72위Blake Scholl 🛫@bschollX에서 보기

글쓴이는 보잉과 에어버스가 AI로 비행 제어 소프트웨어의 코너 케이스 버그를 찾고 있는지 궁금해하며, AI가 346명의 사망으로 이어진 MCAS 버그를 미리 찾을 수 있었을지 묻는다.

좋아요 430리포스트 19답글 49노출 50.5K북마크 30

73위Parker Conrad@parkerconradX에서 보기

Rippling은 올해 3분기에 한 분기 만에 nnARR이 1억 5천만 달러 넘게 늘었다고 발표하며, 그 성장의 상당 부분이 Rippling AI에서 나왔다고 밝혔다.

좋아요 320리포스트 26답글 16노출 38.2K북마크 20

Rippling is celebrating a remarkable business milestone. We added over $150mm in nnARR in a single quarter in Q3. A big part of that is the growth of Rippling AI. I'm incredibly grateful to our employees and customers for believing in us - thank you.

74위Will Poff-Webster@willpoffwebsterX에서 보기

작성자는 하나의 법안이 약 10만 개의 일자리를 만들고 가계 에너지 요금을 낮추며 온실가스 배출도 줄인다는 점이 매우 놀랍다고 말한다.

좋아요 304리포스트 37답글 10노출 19.3K북마크 18

Pretty incredible that one bill a) creates 100,000 jobs, b) reduces Americans' monthly bills, and c) reduces greenhouse gas emissions
Employ America@employamerica
The Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA) would encourage new generation facilities, transmission lines, and reduce energy prices. Employ America estimated that this would produce up to 105,600 jobs in manufacturing, construction, and other industrial sectors.

75위NASA@NASAX에서 보기

NASA는 케네디 우주센터에서 열리는 항공우주 엑스포이자 에어쇼인 MAX POWER의 개막 연설을 트럼프 대통령이 한다고 생중계 소식을 알렸다.

좋아요 230리포스트 40답글 40노출 92.8K북마크 12

76위DHH@dhhX에서 보기

Omarchy 커뮤니티에 3,669명의 작성자가 올린 플러그인 6,000개 이상이 등록되었고, 저장소 점검과 "Just Updated" 기능 추가 등 사이트가 개선되었으며, 공개되지 않은 프로그램도 많다는 내용이다.

좋아요 288리포스트 14답글 29노출 18.6K북마크 15

And these are just the fraction of programs that people choose to publish! Many more just run on people's bespoke machines.
HANCORE@hancore_linux
Over 6,000 #omarchy community plugins from 3,669 authors are now listed. I’ve recently reviewed & merged PRs, delisted plugins with inaccessible repositories, and migrated entries for repositories that had moved. New on the site: “Just Updated” joins “Just Landed” thanks to @AryanHv’s feedback, along with more improvements from our contributors. plugins.omarchy.org

77위Canos@canos_aiX에서 보기

Canos는 개에게 사람용 액체 생검 기술을 적용해 암을 더 일찍 발견하는 것을 목표로 한다고 소개한다.

좋아요 62리포스트 7답글 25노출 4.9K북마크 2

Canos is not Theranos. We ask for a tube🩸 and deliver one thing well: catching cancer in dogs earlier. 1 in 4 dogs are diagnosed with cancer, most found late. Canos (YC F26) 🐕 is changing that by bringing the human liquid biopsy standard to dogs, because they deserve the best.

79위Philip Johnston@PhilipJohnstonX에서 보기

작성자는 Y Combinator에서 Starcloud 이야기를 다시 발표하게 되어 즐거웠다고 말하며 초대해 준 사람에게 감사를 전한다.

좋아요 77리포스트 6답글 7노출 6.6K북마크 2

80위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

a16z는 2026년 보고서를 인용해 침해의 35%가 피싱이나 로그인 탈취, 사칭 사기에서 시작되고 절반 가까이가 벤더나 파트너와 관련된다며 투자할 만한 사이버보안 기업 여섯 곳을 소개했다.

좋아요 35리포스트 8답글 10노출 9.9K북마크 26

81위Justin Martin@JMMindX에서 보기

작성자는 텍사스 모든 카운티가 왜 좌편향으로 바뀌었는지 궁금해 1948년 이후 선거 자료를 모아 웹페이지를 만들었고, 이번 선거의 변화폭이 과거에도 종종 있었던 수준이라는 결과를 보여준다.

좋아요 7리포스트 1답글 6노출 3.1K북마크 5

Last night I was pondering the outcome of this election. Living it Texas, it felt very real. I wanted to understand how EVERY county in TX could have moved to the left. That seemed impossibly odd. Suspiciously odd. I needed to understand. So I made this: justinmmartin.me/blog/the-shift… I pulled in dozens of sources to get the outcomes and shifts in the last 20 presidential elections, and the midterms between them, going back to 1948. The evidence was extremely surprising. This election, while having a huge swing, wasn't a major outlier. There have been plenty of elections with MUCH larger swings. Take a look at the webpage. You can view each and every county, how they swung each election, and a bunch of other really insightful comparisons.

82위TypeSafe AI@typesafeaiX에서 보기

typesafeai는 바이브 코딩으로 누구나 앱을 쉽게 만들 수 있는지 의문을 제기하며, 자사 서비스로 아이디어를 실제 제품으로 만들어 보라고 권했다.

좋아요 32리포스트 0답글 3노출 6.5K북마크 12

oh so everybody vibecoding their own app is easy now? just a slop cannon away from everything you want in life? prove it! hypership your dreams into reality today
Product Hunt 😸@ProductHunt
Hypership is BACK for our 13th birthday!! Celebrate with us by requesting features and reporting bugs on the launches featured on today's leaderboard. To those who ship, you have a chance to win credits from @typesafeai and @supabase! Makers, how fast can you get features to prod?

83위Google Cloud Tech@GoogleCloudTechX에서 보기

BigQuery와 Dataform에 추가된 새 폴더 기능으로 대량 이동과 삭제, 전체 경로 보기가 가능해졌으며 관련 가이드 링크를 함께 안내한다.

좋아요 6리포스트 1답글 0노출 2.4K북마크 2

84위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

Salesforce의 John Somorjai는 ARR만 보는 지표 함정과 이탈률, 보안팀의 거부권 등 기업 인수 거래를 무너뜨리는 요인과 준비의 중요성을 설명한다.

좋아요 28리포스트 0답글 7노출 11.6K북마크 7

John Somorjai of Salesforce on what kills company acquisition deals, from attrition hiding behind ARR to a veto from the security team: "It's really important that you're ready and you're organized so that the data is flowing and it doesn't look like you're having trouble getting access to data." "One of the mistakes that a lot of founders are making these days is they focus on one metric alone, which is ARR. And ARR is a wonderful metric, but it masks attrition." "When you meet with a company that has very high attrition, that usually means that there are a lot of not just unhappy customers, but there might be some product quality issues as well." "We have 14 functions that we work with on all of our diligence processes, and security is the one function that can hold up the red flag and say, 'I'm killing this deal.'" "You definitely want to identify the vulnerabilities before we do." "Nothing goes better in a process when a company is totally buttoned up... But when they don't, that's when, you know, deals can die." @jsomorjai @aleximm
a16z@a16z
Salesforce's John Somorjai has spent more than 20 years doing deals for Marc Benioff, from Slack to six rounds of Anthropic, and runs a venture arm that has backed more than 750 companies. His playbook is finding great technology that's starved for distribution and plugging it into 15,000 sales reps. Salesforce piloted Fin on its own help site, where it went live in 14 days and now handles over 40% of the traffic, resolving 65% without a human. John joins a16z's Alex Immerman to discuss why Slack revenue is up almost 3x since the acquisition, how strong revenue can hide the churn that kills deals, the pen test that got into a CEO's laptop, and why robotics is where he's most excited to invest. 0:58 How Marc Benioff spots what to buy 3:48 The 3 tests for every acquisition 5:17 Salesforce's model as AI cuts seats 8:23 Fin resolves 65% with no human 10:32 The power of 15,000 sales reps 14:22 Founders who became product chiefs 17:34 Build vs buy when code is cheap 20:27 Why Salesforce bought Fin 22:58 Why Slack is perfect for AI agents 28:19 Salesforce Ventures' robotics bets 35:46 Why he's wary of new CRM startups 37:53 Why $10B+ startups have few buyers 39:32 Why he backed Anthropic six times 41:50 Red flags that kill acquisitions 44:27 The pen test that sank a deal 46:01 Growing up with a scientist father YouTube: youtu.be/y4BdOtm40SA @jsomorjai @salesforce @aleximm

85위a16z@a16zX에서 보기

Salesforce의 John Somorjai와 a16z의 Alex Immerman은 현재 스타트업 밸류에이션이 지나치게 높아 조정이 올 수 있으며, 상위 1% 성과의 규모가 커져 수익을 이끌고 있다고 논의했다.

좋아요 29리포스트 7답글 13노출 9.8K북마크 6

John Somorjai of Salesforce on the exit math behind today's startup valuations, and a16z's Alex Immerman on the much bigger outcomes that now drive returns: John: "I think there's a lot of irresponsibility going on. The valuations are of course way too high." "When you think about investing, you want to think about, what are my exit opportunities? And not every company is going to go public. In fact, very, very few companies go public, probably 1% or less." "Once you get above $10 billion, for example, the buyer universe is so small, and yet you're seeing so many of these enormous multi-billion dollar valued companies out there, and there will be a reckoning that happens." "A lot of these companies have valuations that are not sustainable, that they won't be able to grow into, and are also, I think, going to be bad for their employees." Alex: "Part of my optimism comes from what a top one percent outcome was 10 years ago is very different from what a top one percent outcome is today... There have been these larger outcomes that drive the returns for the ecosystem at large." John: "I'm an optimist. I could not do my job if I wasn't an optimist. But just know that I see the thousands of companies every year that don't make it. Because they all come to us to try to be acquired." @jsomorjai @aleximm
a16z@a16z
Salesforce's John Somorjai has spent more than 20 years doing deals for Marc Benioff, from Slack to six rounds of Anthropic, and runs a venture arm that has backed more than 750 companies. His playbook is finding great technology that's starved for distribution and plugging it into 15,000 sales reps. Salesforce piloted Fin on its own help site, where it went live in 14 days and now handles over 40% of the traffic, resolving 65% without a human. John joins a16z's Alex Immerman to discuss why Slack revenue is up almost 3x since the acquisition, how strong revenue can hide the churn that kills deals, the pen test that got into a CEO's laptop, and why robotics is where he's most excited to invest. 0:58 How Marc Benioff spots what to buy 3:48 The 3 tests for every acquisition 5:17 Salesforce's model as AI cuts seats 8:23 Fin resolves 65% with no human 10:32 The power of 15,000 sales reps 14:22 Founders who became product chiefs 17:34 Build vs buy when code is cheap 20:27 Why Salesforce bought Fin 22:58 Why Slack is perfect for AI agents 28:19 Salesforce Ventures' robotics bets 35:46 Why he's wary of new CRM startups 37:53 Why $10B+ startups have few buyers 39:32 Why he backed Anthropic six times 41:50 Red flags that kill acquisitions 44:27 The pen test that sank a deal 46:01 Growing up with a scientist father YouTube: youtu.be/y4BdOtm40SA @jsomorjai @salesforce @aleximm

86위Google DeepMind@GoogleDeepMindX에서 보기

현재의 2048비트 시스템은 이 특정 공격에 안전하지만, AI 시대에는 과거의 난제 가정에 의존할 수 없어 암호 표준을 지속적으로 검증해야 한다는 점을 강조한다.

좋아요 69리포스트 3답글 10노출 15.6K북마크 10

87위NVIDIA Newsroom@nvidianewsroomX에서 보기

NVIDIA 뉴스룸은 브루클린 6G 서밋 전시장에서 파트너들이 차세대 무선 통신에 NVIDIA 기술을 적용한 사례를 소개하고, 6G 연구를 지원하는 오픈소스 도구를 알렸다.

좋아요 45리포스트 11답글 7노출 11.1K북마크 6

88위Google Cloud@googlecloudX에서 보기

Google Cloud는 11월 9일 오전 9시(PT)에 Amin Vahdat와 Mark Lohmeyer가 참여하는 AI 인프라 신기술 공개 행사를 연다고 알린다.

좋아요 27리포스트 4답글 4노출 3.1K북마크 3

92위BrendanEich@BrendanEichX에서 보기

Brendan Eich는 Google Gemini가 'AI 모드' 관련 글을 극찬했지만 그 평가가 틀리지 않다고 말했다.

좋아요 1리포스트 0답글 0노출 328북마크 1

93위BrendanEich@BrendanEichX에서 보기

Brendan Eich는 이번 캘리포니아 대출 제도가 과거 무심사 대출과 다르지만, 주정부가 은행과 사모펀드에게 수수료를 안겨주고 나중 위험은 다른 사람들이 떠안게 만든다고 비판했다.

좋아요 4리포스트 0답글 0노출 334북마크 1